Investing in tools scales staff productivity

Nearly every manufacturer is feeling the pressure of a labour shortage. As baby boomers retire and millennials prefer to work in other industries, manufacturers have had to decrease production or spend more money on recruiting and training. But what if I told you that there is an answer? There are digital tools out there that can help you scale your staff productivity with little-to-no cost investment.

The most important thing about investing in these kinds of tools for your company is that they allow you to do more with less by automating repetitive tasks so employees don’t need as much time per task. This means that even though each employee costs more than someone who doesn’t use these types of tools, it’s still worth it because those employees are able to handle far more work overall.

It’s not just about saving money on recruiting and training. You’ll be able to do more with the same amount of staff, meaning you can create a more efficient supply chain because tasks are being done in less time. This will also lead to faster delivery times for customers which means they’re going to be happier and so will your bottom line.

The business case

Today, there is a wealth of no-code AI-powered automation options available to help manufacturers digitally transform their operations to better scale. We believe in the business benefit from this route for manufacturers (indeed, it’s our entire business model!) so we wanted to share the business case for the investment to help make it clearer why this investment in time and cash in tools is good for your business.

Our research shows that best-in-class tools are the top contributor to business success—enabling greater productivity, visibility, and coordination. Yet only 5 percent of executives recognized this link and ranked tools among their top-three software enablers. Microsoft

Start with your existing team

Let’s start with the use case of an existing team. You want to be able to add 1 Full Time Employee (FTE) equivalent of throughput to your team.

Your options are to hire a new person or to look for productivity gains in the team. You ask them, and as they don’t have a lot of tools right now, the team thinks they spend 20% of their time on stuff tools can automate.

So, if you can automate 20% of the work for 5 team members, you can get 1FTE extra whilst only spending the cash to buy the tools and maybe even splurge on training to ensure they’re using the tools well.

Contrast that with a new hire. To hire a new person, you usually not only have to pay their full salary but pay some recruitment costs. These could be to a recruiter, or they could just be the huge amount of your time spent on filtering CVs, interviewing, contract negotiating, liaising with HR and so on. You hire this person and because they too have no tools, you don’t actually get 1FTE. You get 0.8FTE! You’d have to hire one and a bit people to actually achieve the goal.

Putting some hypothetical numbers against these two cases, it can cost 4 times more on upskilling new hires that it could to unlock productivity for your existing team.

Retain staff for longer

The study from Microsoft & McKinsey, found that investment in tools improves satisfaction and improves retention by 47%.

In the scenario below, we have our original 5 staff and over 6 years maintain the headcount. For pessimism’s sake I’ve assumed we have to buy everyone who starts tools again, even though licenses typically can be reassigned. Even with an extra outlay for tools and training on each new hire, it still costs less than the costs incurred by additional recruitment for higher churn.

Scale becomes cheaper

Whenever an organization becomes technologically advanced, it will eventually reach a point where the cost-benefit trade-off once again makes it cheaper to hire than continue automating. You’ll need to hire eventually if you want to keep adding throughput. Because of tooling and your investment, as your company grows you’ll need fewer staff than you would otherwise for throughput gains due to lower wasted time.

Let’s say you want to add 5FTE more throughput to your team and you use existing team’s performance as your benchmark. Without tools, each staff member is 0.8 FTE but with tools they’re 1FTE. You’ll need to hire 6 people instead of 5 to get roughly 5FTE if you don’t invest in tools. Even taking into account the cost of tools, you still save one headcount worth of salary.

Build your own business case

We put together a very quick and easily modifiable business case calculator for you to add in your salaries, automation ratios, and planned spend to help gauge the return on investment you can get.

Download the business case spreadsheet and give it a go!